Some people believe that some persons who breach Social Norms or commit a crime must be under some harder limitations in the society and they are not entitled to have all the human rights. But, we must deny this belief. Because, the right of the society to perform. Some restrictive provisions against the offenders do not mean that the society has the right to deprive them of human rights, but also. The society has a duty of respecting these rights.One of the social groups, are the persons, who are labeled of addiction. This label, irrespective of Legal effects, because of society's negative opinion on addicts, in itself, is restrictive and when we consider it criminal, the limitations become twofold.The case in this essay is, if the legislator is right to deprive the addicts from human rights Have Iranian Legislators respected addicts human rights? How much? If not, why? Or the legislator, in practice, these rights and the provisions are not in contradiction with human rights.

In order to preserve and value the fundamental rights of individuals, and to reduce the burden of oppression on vulnerable groups, the international community today has taken over the international agreements that often reflect the general principle of non-discrimination in the Universal Declaration of human rights. Many scholars believe that although Western schools have often addressed the status and promotion of the term human rights, they are not the main originators of it. The history of human rights well be traced back in the divine religions, especially in the religion of Islam.The purpose of this paper is to investigate how to support vulnerable groups in the international community in compliance with the international law, explain them legally, and the dire necessity of addressing them to adapt to the views of Islam and the teachings of Imam Ali (AS). This descriptive-analytical study shows the weaknesses of many human thoughts that have tried to correct it by trial and error, while in the sermons, letters and statements of the revered Imam, vulnerable groups have always been taken into consideration and the Imam has prevented discrimination among individuals through education in their human rights.

This research article examines legal discrimination against children born out of wedlock in Iran. Despite laws promoting equality, societal attitudes influenced by beliefs continue to result in discrimination. The study explores the reconciliation of religious beliefs with legal frameworks and the changes made to the Iranian legal system in response to positive human rights developments. The Article seeks to bridge the research gaps by comparing the experiences of Iranian children with those in other countries affected by Islamic law. The study employs library sources and descriptive and historical research methods to examine the legal status of children born outside of marriage, both nationally and internationally, and the discrimination they face. The Article is structured into four distinct sections: an analysis of Islamic Law, a review of the Iranian legal system, an assessment of Iran's compliance with international conventions, and a discourse on the necessity of substantial positive change. The Article ultimately recommends the eradication of discrimination through heightened awareness and the advancement of inclusivity for all children, irrespective of their lineage. In summary, this research Article aims to shed light on legal challenges faced by children born outside of marriage in Iran, with the goal of promoting positive changes in their treatment.

human rights in Shiite Government have heavenly origin, which are blended with natural rights and human conscience. The approach of Shiite Government using Islamic religion looks at the future but learns from the past. The concept of human rights as one of the subjects of international regimes (states) has historical background in present world system. All bibles (holy books), particularly Quran, Kurosh’s charter and his eminence Ali’s lectures referred to basic concepts of human rights in different dimensions and emphasized on following these principles in their management approach. In this study, it is tried to consider the historical background and the systems of human rights, bible and fundamental concepts of human rights in Alavi management, such as life right, freedom right, equality right and human munificence right. Our findings will indicate that practical function of these concepts has a special position in Alavi management and it is significant in Islamic republic management of Iran. Therefore, on the consideration of the latest theories of International relations, Shiite Government can be a pattern for other political systems of the world.

Several international human rights documents purport to affirm women’ s rights. But can women’ s rights really be human rights? The problem is not whether women can possess human rights. Women are human beings and therefore can have all the human rights that men can have. But if there are any special women’ s rights, then presumably these are rights they possess as women, not as human beings, while human rights are rights one possesses as a human being, not in some other capacity such as a citizen, a creditor or a woman. Hence, women’ s rights would seem not to be human rights. (1) Perhaps women’ s rights are human rights possessed equally by men and women but of special importance to women. Thus, the right to freedom from discrimination is a right of all human beings, but might be declared to be a woman’ s right because women are more often subjected to discrimination than men. But this explanation does not fit a woman’ s right to special protection from harmful work during pregnancy. (2) Perhaps women’ s rights are conditional human rights like the human right to social security if one becomes incapable of earning a living. But this cannot explain a woman’ s right to paid maternity leaves. At this point one might conclude that special women’ s rights, important as they may be, are not human rights. However, I shall propose another explanation. (3) Women’ s rights are derived human rights. For example, the basic human right to vote implies the more specific women’ s right to vote on equal terms with men. And a necessary condition for women to effectively enjoy the basic human right to work is their right not to be dismissed on the grounds of pregnancy. Although rights like these are special rights of women only, they are still rights they possess as human beings because they are derived from universal basic human rights.

human rights have known as the heart of UN activities. The defense of human rights, in fact, is defense of human respect.In the other hand, the considerable population with disability lives in different countries in the world, which annually increases over 10 million people.In the developing countries, this big population includes poor, independents, under oppression and rudeness, forgotten people and deprive from public and vocational education and no job.The efforts to understand the human rights initiate with approval "The World Declaration of human rights" in 1948, then this declaration could be an appropriate center to design and formulate several declarations, resolutions, regulations, rules and convention to support human rights in the world.In the first declaration the people with disability was clearly included because of articles7 and 25 and then in "World Declaration on rights of Mental Retardation People" in 1971 and "World Declaration on rights of Disabled People" in 1975 and "The World Convention on rights of Children" in 1981 and "The Standard Rules for Equalization of Opportunities for Disabled People" in 1993, emphasis, considerably.Now, the most important challenge is, the discussion of general assembly on "International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities". So by approval this, the final step will be take to regards the human rights of disabled people in the third millennium.

Transnational Corporations (TCs) are one of the principal participating in the political, social and economic contemporary world. These corporations have put out desire and appropriate achievements, as well as harmful disorders in human rights domains. The latter, has led to a disputed issue in international law. Do the TCs have any human rights obligations? In response to this question, two main approaches have been formed. The first approach, is the ethical approach which argues that human rights as a priori fundamental ethical obligations are assignable to all entities including TCs. The second approach is institutional approach which contends that human rights are those rights that have been listed in human rights Declaration and subsequent international instruments and contemplates that States are considered to be principal duty bearers towards human rights obligations. According to the latter approach, the lack of direct assignment of human rights obligations to TCs is a more appropriate way to protect these rights. This article examines both approaches and at the same time it pays attention to the documents of the human rights Council which has produced many documents in this respect. This article concludes that although TCs have human rights obligations, States are still being considered direct duty bearers towards human rights obligations.

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the existing conflicts between Islamic human rights and universal human rights in the field of women's rights?Method: Using a qualitative method based on collecting information from library sources (documentary) and descriptive analytical method, the present article seeks to assess the hypothesis presented in this research.Findings: In areas such as individual rights (right of citizenship, right to residence and housing), family rights (age of marriage, freedom to choose and polygamy, right of guardianship over the spouse, right Divorce and custody of the child), social rights (right to insurance and social security benefits and the right to health services), Women's cultural and spiritual rights (right to literacy based on co-education and restrictions on sending female students abroad), economic rights (right to work in certain occupations and also right to inheritance), political rights (right to be elected to some key positions in the country) Such as leadership and presidency) as well as in the legal and judicial spheres (women's right to legal personality, equality before the law and some women's civil and criminal rights such as blood money and martyrdom) conflicts between Islamic human rights and human rights The world is visible.Results: In addition to legal conflicts, differences in interpretations and the existence of some legal ambiguities between the two sources of Islamic and international human rights can be seen, which in practice leads to non-acceptance and accession to some human rights conventions in the field of women for Iran.

The theoretical possibility of cloning human beings very recently has become an internationally fiercely debated issue. The publicity given to cloning the sheep "Dolly" in Scotland in middle of February 1997 has provoked a discussion about the possible extensions of such a technique to humans, which primarily dose not touch upon the biomedical implications, but is first and foremost concentrated on the ethical and legal aspects attributed to it. human cloning is the creation of a genetically identical copy of an existing, or previously existing, human being or clone tissue from that individual. Scientists distinct between two types of cloning. The first type, sometimes described as "Reproductive" cloning, involves the creation of an embryo through cloning and its subsequent implantation into the uterus with the objective of creating a living human. The other kind of experiment, sometimes described as "research", "experimental", or "therapeutic" cloning, involves the creation of a cloned embryo, which is grown to a fetal stage, tissues for transplantation. Subsequent of this fact, Ethicists, Researchers, and Legislators across the globe scrambled to identify the ramifications of the cloning experiment. Most of the world's religious groups took stances on the issue. Nations attempted to separate fact from fiction and decide what regulatory precautions, if any, were required. This Atricle evaluates human rights law responses to human cloning and survey the profit and harm of this method.